Example of using the @Component
decorator can be found in a project that implements a dashboard with multiple widgets. Each widget can be a separate Angular component defined using the @Component
decorator.
For instance, consider a WeatherWidgetComponent
that displays the current weather information for a given location:
import { Component, Input } from '@angular/core';
import { WeatherService } from '../weather.service';
import { Weather } from '../weather.model';
@Component({
selector: 'app-weather-widget',
template: `
<div *ngIf="weather$ | async as weather">
<h3>{{ weather.location }}</h3>
<p>{{ weather.temperature }}°C</p>
<p>{{ weather.description }}</p>
</div>
`,
styles: [`
div {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
padding: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
`]
})
export class WeatherWidgetComponent {
@Input() location: string;
weather$ = this.weatherService.getWeather(this.location);
constructor(private weatherService: WeatherService) {}
}
In this example, the @Component
decorator is used to define the WeatherWidgetComponent
with a custom HTML tag (app-weather-widget
), an inline template, and CSS styles. The component takes a location input and uses an injected WeatherService
to fetch the weather information.
In Angular, change detection is the process of detecting and handling changes in the component’s data and view bindings. When a component is instantiated, Angular automatically creates a change detector for it. This change detector is responsible for tracking and propagating changes in the component’s bindings to ensure that the view remains up-to-date with the underlying data.
The change detection process can be configured using the ChangeDetectionStrategy
enum, which provides two primary strategies: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
and ChangeDetectionStrategy.Default
. These strategies determine how and when the change detector checks for changes in the component’s bindings.
- ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush:
When using the ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
strategy, the change detector is set to check for changes only when the component’s input properties change. This strategy is also known as “on-demand” change detection. It is more performant than the default strategy because it reduces the number of unnecessary change detection cycles.
In other words, when a component is marked with ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
, Angular checks the input properties for changes only once when the component is created. After that, Angular will only check the input properties again when an event is triggered, such as an input property being updated, or when a user interaction occurs (e.g., a button click or form submission).
To use the ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
strategy, you can set the changeDetection
property in the @Component
decorator. You can optimize application performance by using the ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
strategy when creating components. This strategy allows Angular to skip checking for changes when the input properties don’t change, resulting in fewer change detection cycles and better performance.
Here’s an example of using ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
for the WeatherWidgetComponent
:
import { Component, Input, ChangeDetectionStrategy } from '@angular/core';
import { WeatherService } from '../weather.service';
import { Weather } from '../weather.model';
@Component({
selector: 'app-weather-widget',
template: `
<div *ngIf="weather$ | async as weather">
<h3>{{ weather.location }}</h3>
<p>{{ weather.temperature }}°C</p>
<p>{{ weather.description }}</p>
</div>
`,
styles: [`
div {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
padding: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
`],
changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
})
export class WeatherWidgetComponent {
@Input() location: string;
weather$ = this.weatherService.getWeather(this.location);
constructor(private weatherService: WeatherService) {}
}
- ChangeDetectionStrategy.Default:
When using the ChangeDetectionStrategy.Default
strategy, the change detector checks for changes in the component’s bindings after every asynchronous event, such as a timer or an XHR request. This strategy is also known as “check-always” change detection.
In other words, with the ChangeDetectionStrategy.Default
strategy, Angular checks the component’s bindings after every asynchronous event, even if the component’s input properties have not changed. This strategy is less performant than ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush
because it can result in unnecessary change detection cycles.
In Angular, viewProviders
are used to define a set of injectable objects that are visible to the component’s view DOM children. By configuring viewProviders
in a component, you can provide a specific instance of a service that will be shared among the component and its view children.
When Angular creates a component, it also creates a hierarchy of injectors. The component’s injector is responsible for creating instances of the component’s dependencies, and it is also responsible for creating injectors for the component’s child components.
The viewProviders
property allows you to define a set of providers that are visible only to the component’s view children. When Angular creates an instance of a child component, it will first look for a provider in the child component’s providers
array. If it does not find a provider there, Angular will continue to look for a provider in the parent component’s viewProviders
array.
Here’s an example of using viewProviders
to provide a specific instance of a service to a component and its view children:
import { Component, ViewChildren, QueryList, ViewChild, AfterViewInit, ElementRef } from '@angular/core';
import { SomeService } from './some.service';
@Component({
selector: 'app-parent',
template: `
<app-child></app-child>
<app-child></app-child>
`,
styleUrls: ['./parent.component.css'],
providers: [],
viewProviders: [
{ provide: SomeService, useClass: SomeServiceInstance }
]
})
export class ParentComponent implements AfterViewInit {
constructor() {}
ngAfterViewInit() {
// You can access the shared instance of SomeService here
}
}
@Component({
selector: 'app-child',
template: `
<div #childElement></div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./child.component.css']
})
export class ChildComponent implements AfterViewInit {
@ViewChildren('childElement') childElements: QueryList<ElementRef>;
@ViewChild('childElement', { static: false }) childElement: ElementRef;
constructor(private someService: SomeService) {}
ngAfterViewInit() {
// You can access the shared instance of SomeService here
}
}
In this example, the ParentComponent
has two child components, ChildComponent
. The ParentComponent
defines a viewProviders
array that includes a provider for SomeService
with a specific instance of the service, SomeServiceInstance
.
When Angular creates an instance of the ChildComponent
, it will first look for a provider for SomeService
in the ChildComponent
’s providers
array. If it does not find one there, Angular will continue to look for a provider in the ParentComponent
’s viewProviders
array. Since the ParentComponent
has defined a provider for SomeService
, Angular will use the instance of SomeServiceInstance
to create an instance of SomeService
that will be shared among the ChildComponent
instances.
By using viewProviders
, you can ensure that a specific instance of a service is shared among the component and its view children. This can be useful when you want to share state or behavior between components without making the service available to the entire application.
To optimize system performance with viewProviders
is to use them to provide a shared service to a group of components that are related to each other. By doing so, you can reduce the number of instances of the service that are created and shared among components, which can improve the overall performance of the application.
Here’s an example of using viewProviders
to provide a shared service to a group of components:
import { Component, ViewChildren, QueryList, ViewChild, AfterViewInit, ElementRef } from '@angular/core';
import { SomeSharedService } from './some-shared.service';
@Component({
selector: 'app-parent',
template: `
<app-child1></app-child1>
<app-child2></app-child2>
<app-child3></app-child3>
`,
styleUrls: ['./parent.component.css'],
viewProviders: [
SomeSharedService
]
})
export class ParentComponent {
constructor() {}
}
@Component({
selector: 'app-child1',
template: `
<div>Child 1</div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./child1.component.css']
})
export class Child1Component {
constructor(private someSharedService: SomeSharedService) {}
}
@Component({
selector: 'app-child2',
template: `
<div>Child 2</div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./child2.component.css']
})
export class Child2Component {
constructor(private someSharedService: SomeSharedService) {}
}
@Component({
selector: 'app-child3',
template: `
<div>Child 3</div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./child3.component.css']
})
export class Child3Component {
constructor(private someSharedService: SomeSharedService) {}
}
In this example, the ParentComponent
defines a viewProviders
array that includes a provider for SomeSharedService
. This means that the SomeSharedService
will be shared among the Child1Component
, Child2Component
, and Child3Component
instances.
When Angular creates an instance of the Child1Component
, Child2Component
, or Child3Component
, it will first look for a provider for SomeSharedService
in the component’s providers
array. If it does not find one there, Angular will continue to look for a provider in the ParentComponent
’s viewProviders
array. Since the ParentComponent
has defined a provider for SomeSharedService
, Angular will use the same instance of SomeSharedService
to create instances of SomeSharedService
that will be shared among the Child1Component
, Child2Component
, and Child3Component
instances.
By using viewProviders
to provide a shared service to a group of components, you can reduce the number of instances of the service that are created and shared among components, which can improve the overall performance of the application. This can be especially important in large-scale applications where performance is a critical factor.
In Angular, encapsulation refers to the way in which component styles are scoped to a specific component and its view hierarchy. Encapsulation is important in large-scale applications because it helps to avoid naming collisions and makes it easier to maintain and manage styles.
The ViewEncapsulation
enum in Angular provides three different encapsulation policies that can be applied to a component:
ViewEncapsulation.Emulated
: This is the default encapsulation policy in Angular. It emulates the behavior of native Shadow DOM by applying a modified version of the component’s styles to the component’s view hierarchy. This ensures that the component’s styles are not leaked to the global scope and do not interfere with styles in other components. However, it does not provide the same level of encapsulation as native Shadow DOM.ViewEncapsulation.None
: This policy applies the component’s styles globally without any encapsulation. This means that the component’s styles are applied to the entire document and can interfere with styles in other components. This policy is not recommended for large-scale applications because it can lead to naming collisions and make it difficult to maintain and manage styles.ViewEncapsulation.ShadowDom
: This policy uses the browser’s native Shadow DOM API to encapsulate styles. Shadow DOM is a native web standard that provides a way to encapsulate styles and markup within a component’s view hierarchy. This policy provides the highest level of encapsulation and ensures that the component’s styles are completely isolated from styles in other components. However, it is not supported by all browsers and can lead to performance issues in some cases.
The ViewEncapsulation
policy can be set in the @Component
decorator using the encapsulation
property. For example:
import { Component, ViewEncapsulation } from '@angular/core';
@Component({
selector: 'app-example',
template: `
<div class="example">Example Component</div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./example.component.css'],
encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.Emulated
})
export class ExampleComponent {}
In this example, the ExampleComponent
is using the default ViewEncapsulation.Emulated
policy. This means that the component’s styles will be emulated to provide a level of encapsulation that is similar to native Shadow DOM.
The ViewEncapsulation
policy can be useful in large-scale applications where there are many components with complex styles. By using encapsulation, you can ensure that the styles for each component are isolated and do not interfere with each other. This can help to reduce naming collisions and make it easier to maintain and manage styles.
For example, in a large-scale application with many components that have complex styles, you might use ViewEncapsulation.ShadowDom
to provide the highest level of encapsulation. However, this policy is not supported by all browsers and can lead to performance issues in some cases.
On the other hand, if you have a component that has no styles or styleUrls, you might use ViewEncapsulation.None
to avoid the overhead of encapsulation. This can improve the performance of the component, but it can also lead to naming collisions and make it difficult to maintain and manage styles.
In general, the ViewEncapsulation
policy should be chosen based on the specific needs of the application and the component. By understanding the different encapsulation policies and how they affect component styles.